In a current weblog submit, cryptocurrency legend and former BitMEX CEO Arthur Hayes mentioned he holds sizable luggage of GMX and LOOKS tokens. Based on Hayes, his foremost reasoning for investing in each was their platform income and their potential to outperform commonplace Treasury payments.
Let’s take a quick take a look at on-chain information and examine GMX and LOOKS to rivals to find out whether or not Arthur’s assumption will work out.
GMX utilization cooling after a powerful November
The week previous to Nov. 16 offered decentralized finance (DeFi) with a big inflow in charges after the centralized trade (CEX) exodus triggered by FTX’s chapter. The short-term excessive inflows to DeFi propelled GMX to outperform Uniswap in protocol charges.
On Nov. 28, GMX earned about $1.15 million in every day buying and selling charges, which surpassed Uniswap’s $1.06 million in buying and selling charges on the identical day.
Whereas utilization of GMX could also be reducing, the token is outperforming the business. The GMX token is just 8% away from an all-time excessive, after gaining 59% up to now 30-days.
Since Uniswap is the closest competitor to GMX, evaluating the 2 protocols can present which customers favor to make use of for buying and selling. Except for the price flip on Nov. 28, Uniswap continues to outperform GMX when it comes to price income and every day lively customers. Not like Uniswap, GMX distributes charges to stakers of varied GMX and GLP tokens.
The 90-day peak for Uniswap charges is $5.9 million, whereas GMX’s excessive in every day charges is just $1.4 million. The most important distinction in peak charges could present that GMX has reached capability in the case of platform utilization.
The charges that GMX accrues are cut up 30% to GMX token holders and 70% to GLP holders. The present homepage for GMX estimates an annual share yield of 10% for GMX tokens and 20% for GLP tokens. Whereas GLP would match Hayes’ 20% annual yield purpose, liquidity suppliers are vulnerable to impairment loss and value declines, making it troublesome to make sure success in opposition to the conservative Treasury invoice technique.
OpenSea utilization continues to dominate LooksRare
LooksRare, which can also be the house of the LOOKS token, was additionally talked about by Hayes as a result of charges the NFT protocol earns. Up to now, NFT marketplaces, together with Coinbase, have struggled to chip away at OpenSea’s market dominance.
Whereas OpenSea appears to have a pure circulation of every day lively customers between 35,000 and 50,000, LooksRare has a small vary of 350 to 500 customers. Utilizing this metric, OpenSea is 100 occasions greater than LooksRare and the development doesn’t appear to alter over a 90-day timeframe.
One other distinction between the 2 protocols is that OpenSea doesn’t have a token that emits rewards by means of staking and inflationary minting. The rewards emission could hit Hayes’ 20% purpose, however it must also be famous that LooksRare is infamous for wash buying and selling. The first goal of those wash dealer is to achieve extra LOOKS tokens, however this might have the impact of diluting the worth.
The just lately introduced UniSwap NFT aggregator might assist propel LooksRare to achieve extra “genuine” transactions since customers should buy LooksRare NFTs with out ever visiting the location.
The present price distribution is closely concentrated towards OpenSea. Over the previous 90 days, OpenSea reached a peak of $2.5 million in every day charges, whereas throughout the identical interval LooksRare solely earned over $200,000 in every day charges as soon as.
Investigating the protocol fundamentals talked about by Hayes are an necessary first step when contemplating investing in DeFi and altcoin. Wanting on the aggressive panorama for each LooksRare and GMX, it might take way more adoption for both protocol to overhaul the present leaders. Moreover, the 20% purpose Hayes units out is likely to be a stretch when analyzing inflated emissions and token costs.
The views, ideas and opinions expressed listed here are the authors’ alone and don’t essentially mirror or characterize the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
